-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Participant %7: Team CSV, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas #20
Comments
Excellent, welcome! What's your score on Dataset1?
|
My current scores using just a very naive string comparison based approach: Score on dataset1: 0.1236735 No machine learning yet. |
Yes. The first 0.8 are easy to get (purely due to the data). The remaining points are super hard. Best score seen so far:
|
My last scores:
My current approach: string matching + parse checking A related paper: A comparison of code similarity analysers |
Thanks, I have updated the rankings |
good scores, getting quite close to @tdurieux :-)
|
Hi everyone, I want to give an update of my scores for the preliminary ranking:
My current approach is: string matching + parse checking + decision rules + heuristics |
It seems that you beat @tdurieux!! Congrats.
It's too late to be considered in the intermediate ranking, but it's really remarkable.
|
Thanks @monperrus!! |
Strangely my technique is still better for the dataset 2 but worse for the others. I still have some room for improvement but I am very happy of the performance of my technique. It takes less than 10min to have the results on all datasets. That is helping a lot to try new improvements |
Created for Team CSV(@cesarsotovalero) from the Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas for discussions. Welcome!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: