-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 514
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance Patient Search: User-Friendly Error Message and Accessibility Improvements #9858
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Enhance Patient Search: User-Friendly Error Message and Accessibility Improvements #9858
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhancements to localization and error handling in patient-related functionality. The changes include adding new localization strings in the English JSON file to support more descriptive user interactions, modifying the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/Patients/VerifyPatient.tsx (1)
39-43
: Consider adding loading state.The mutation state could include a loading indicator to improve user feedback.
const { mutate: verifyPatient, data: patientData, isError, + isLoading, } = useMutation({
public/locale/en.json (1)
314-314
: LGTM! Comprehensive localization coverage.The new translation keys properly support all the added features:
- Error messages for verification
- Navigation labels
- Encounter and appointment related text
Note: There's a typo in the key "book_new_appoitment" (should be "appointment").
- "book_new_appoitment": "Book a new appointment", + "book_new_appointment": "Book a new appointment",Also applies to: 475-475, 1206-1206, 1435-1435, 1513-1513, 1618-1618, 1723-1723, 1892-1892
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
public/locale/en.json
(12 hunks)src/components/Form/FormFields/TextFormField.tsx
(5 hunks)src/pages/Patients/VerifyPatient.tsx
(9 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: Header rules - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/Form/FormFields/TextFormField.tsx (4)
44-44
: LGTM! State management for focus tracking.The addition of
isFocused
state is a good approach for managing input focus state.
88-89
: LGTM! Focus event handlers.The focus event handlers are properly implemented to update the state.
127-134
: LGTM! Improved icon transitions.The transition logic has been improved by:
- Moving from peer-based to state-based transitions
- Maintaining the same animation timing and effects
Also applies to: 146-153
76-76
: Consider implications of removing the peer class.The removal of the
peer
class from the input element might affect other components that rely on peer selectors for styling.✅ Verification successful
The removal of the
peer
class appears to be safe.The codebase search shows that while peer classes are used in various components, there are no peer-dependent styles targeting the input elements with
cui-input-base
class. The removal of the peer class from this specific input won't affect other components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any peer-based selectors that might be affected rg -t css "peer-[a-z-]+:"Length of output: 27
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for peer-related patterns in all files echo "=== Searching for peer class usage ===" rg "peer[\s{]" -B2 -A2 echo -e "\n=== Looking for Tailwind config files ===" fd "tailwind.config" echo -e "\n=== Checking for styled-components or CSS module usage ===" rg -l "styled-components|\.module\.(css|scss|less|sass)"Length of output: 3309
src/pages/Patients/VerifyPatient.tsx (2)
5-5
: LGTM! Added i18n and navigation support.Good addition of internationalization and navigation capabilities:
- useTranslation for i18n support
- useAppHistory for navigation
Also applies to: 36-37
228-247
: LGTM! User-friendly error handling.Good implementation of error feedback:
- Clear error message
- Option to go back and retry
- Proper use of translations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's not edit anything in this component. this is deprecated. use newer components instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rithviknishad Shall I replace it with SearchByMultipleFields
on Users and Resource Page?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/Patients/VerifyPatient.tsx (2)
39-43
: Consider adding loading state handlingWhile the error handling is well-implemented, consider adding a loading state to provide feedback during verification.
const { mutate: verifyPatient, data: patientData, isError, + isLoading, } = useMutation({
238-244
: Enhance accessibility attributesConsider adding ARIA attributes to improve screen reader support:
<Button variant={"primary_gradient"} className="gap-3 group" onClick={() => goBack()} + aria-label={t("go_back")} > {t("go_back")} </Button>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
public/locale/en.json
(12 hunks)src/pages/Patients/VerifyPatient.tsx
(9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- public/locale/en.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/pages/Patients/VerifyPatient.tsx (3)
5-5
: LGTM! Clean integration of i18n and navigation hooksThe addition of
useTranslation
anduseAppHistory
hooks is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives for internationalization and navigation improvements.Also applies to: 24-24, 36-37
81-81
: Well-implemented internationalizationExcellent implementation of i18n support with consistent translation key usage throughout the UI components.
Also applies to: 121-123, 143-143, 146-146, 177-177, 180-180, 197-199, 218-218, 221-221
228-247
: Clean implementation of error handling UIThe error display section is well-structured with clear messaging and proper navigation.
👋 Hi, @JavidSumra, This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there. |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Localization
UI Improvements
User Experience