Refer the root object by single dot #253
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
How about *? I think asterisk is better IMO. |
|
Rendering like so {{.}} causes segfault |
|
Thanks for this PR. I'd like to land this, but I'll close this for now until the segfault and tests are resolved. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This closes #234.
When I have a list of items (could be objects as well) in the json data file.
[ "item1", "item2","item3" ]Now when trying to use them in a loop like
Consideration: Is "." appropriate to refer the root document? If not, I'll make another pull request.
Note: This is ad-hoc fix. "." cannot be set as the second or later argument. It may be fixed by #247 though I have not confirmed it.