Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

noncliff: fixes expect #348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2024
Merged

noncliff: fixes expect #348

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2024

Conversation

Fe-r-oz
Copy link
Contributor

@Fe-r-oz Fe-r-oz commented Aug 24, 2024

All the tests in noncliffordquantumoptics.jl should pass now.

If you want to submit an unfinished piece of work in order to get comments and discuss, please mark the pull request as a draft and ping the repository maintainer.

Please address only one topic or issue per pull request! Many small PRs are much easier to review and merge than one large PR.

Before merging, all changes and new functionality should be marked in the CHANGELOG file, but feel free to just leave your CHANGELOG notes in the PR description, to avoid merge conflicts with other requests modifying that file. The maintainer will add these CHANGELOG notes for you if you do so.

Before considering your pull request ready for review and merging make sure that all of the following are completed (please keep the clecklist as part of your PR):

  • The code is properly formatted and commented.
  • Substantial new functionality is documented within the docs.
  • All new functionality is tested.
  • All of the automated tests on github pass.

If possible, keep your git history not too wild (rebase and squash commits, keep commits small and semantically separated) so that review is easier.

@Fe-r-oz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fe-r-oz commented Aug 25, 2024

All the tests passed. This fixes expect from #259. CI-nightly errors not related to this pr. I request review as no further commits will be pushed.

@Fe-r-oz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fe-r-oz commented Aug 31, 2024

@Krastanov, pinging for review. Thank you.

end
return (-1)^(phase÷2) * e
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, neat! That explains the poor results previously! Good find!

@Krastanov Krastanov merged commit bf649a6 into QuantumSavory:nonclif Sep 14, 2024
8 of 12 checks passed
@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

thanks, fixing this was pretty important! Neat to see how minimal the fix was

@Fe-r-oz Fe-r-oz deleted the expect branch September 14, 2024 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants