Fix CI with new valid certificates and add script for future usage #6585
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
arrow
This was referenced Oct 18, 2024
tustvold
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2024
|
Thank you @itsjunetime 🙏 |
alamb
reviewed
Oct 20, 2024
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| #!/bin/sh | |||
|
|
|||
| # source: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/use-tokio-tungstenite-with-rustls-instead-of-native-tls-for-secure-websockets/90130 | |||
This was referenced Oct 21, 2024
Merged
alamb
pushed a commit
to influxdata/arrow-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
findepi
pushed a commit
to sdf-labs/arrow-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
findepi
pushed a commit
to sdf-labs/arrow-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
findepi
pushed a commit
to sdf-labs/arrow-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #6568
Rationale for this change
CI needs to get going again and we need new certificates to do that. Also a script is useful for those who run into this in the future.
What changes are included in this PR?
This includes newly generates certs and keys for the arrow-flight CI test as well as a script to regenerate these certificates and keys in the future
Are there any user-facing changes?
No