intro cleanup proto #2472
intro cleanup proto #2472
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple components and files related to the course page functionality. Key modifications include simplifying the visibility logic for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Bundle ReportChanges will increase total bundle size by 5.06kB (0.01%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
app/templates/course/pre-challenge-assessment.hbs (1)
3-5: Consider enhancing accessibility.The prose text "Complete the pre-challenge assessment below to proceed:" could benefit from proper heading markup for better screen reader navigation.
<div class="prose dark:prose-invert mb-4"> - Complete the pre-challenge assessment below to proceed: + <h2>Complete the pre-challenge assessment below to proceed:</h2> </div>app/components/course-page/introduction-step/welcome-section.hbs (1)
4-7: Add safety check for course name.The course name interpolation could benefit from a safety check to handle potential undefined values gracefully.
Welcome to the -{{@repository.course.name}} +{{or @repository.course.name "course"}} challenge!app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/requested-languages-prompt.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM! Consider enhancing text formatting.The namespace change is consistent with the legacy migration.
Consider enhancing the
willLetYouKnowTextgetter to handle edge cases more elegantly:get willLetYouKnowText() { - return `We'll let you know once ${this.args.requestedAndUnsupportedLanguages.mapBy('name').join(' / ')} support is available on this challenge.`; + const languages = this.args.requestedAndUnsupportedLanguages.mapBy('name'); + const languageList = languages.length > 1 + ? `${languages.slice(0, -1).join(', ')} and ${languages[languages.length - 1]}` + : languages[0]; + return `We'll let you know once ${languageList} support is available on this challenge.`; }This change would make the text more natural to read when multiple languages are listed.
app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/request-language-button.hbs (1)
18-18: LGTM! Consider accessibility improvements.The namespace change is consistent with the legacy migration.
Consider enhancing the dropdown's accessibility by adding ARIA attributes:
<BasicDropdown @horizontalPosition="left" as |dd|> - <dd.Trigger> + <dd.Trigger aria-label="Request other programming language"> <TertiaryButton class="flex items-center group" {{did-insert this.handleDidInsert}}>This would improve the experience for screen reader users.
app/utils/course-page-step-list/introduction-step.ts (2)
Line range hint
7-11: Improve repository type definitionThe constructor accepts
unknowntype for repository but doesn't validate its structure.Consider defining an interface for the repository and adding runtime validation:
interface Repository { language: string | null; course: { slug: string; }; } constructor(repository: unknown) { super(); if (!this.isValidRepository(repository)) { throw new Error('Invalid repository structure'); } this.repository = repository; } private isValidRepository(value: unknown): value is Repository { return ( typeof value === 'object' && value !== null && 'language' in value && 'course' in value && typeof value.course === 'object' && value.course !== null && 'slug' in value.course && typeof value.course.slug === 'string' ); }
18-18: Consider i18n for user-facing stringsThe hardcoded strings 'Language selected.' and 'Select language' should be internationalized if the application supports multiple languages.
Consider using a translation service or helper:
-text: 'Language selected.', +text: this.intl.t('course.steps.introduction.language_selected'), -return 'Select language'; +return this.intl.t('course.steps.introduction.title');Also applies to: 41-41
app/utils/course-page-step-list/pre-challenge-assessment-step.ts (1)
36-42: Consider improving type safety for status return valueThe status getter could benefit from a more explicit type definition to ensure type safety throughout the application.
Consider adding a union type:
- get status() { + get status(): 'locked' | 'complete' | 'in_progress' {app/components/course-page/header/main-section.ts (1)
25-42: Consider using constants for step typesThe string literal 'IntroductionStep' could be replaced with a constant or enum to improve maintainability and prevent typos.
Consider creating a constant or enum:
// In step.ts or a new types file export enum StepType { Introduction = 'IntroductionStep', PreChallengeAssessment = 'PreChallengeAssessmentStep', // ... other step types } // Then in this file: if (this.args.currentStep.type === StepType.Introduction) {app/components/course-page/introduction-step/welcome-section.ts (1)
39-39: Remove commented out codeThe commented out
expandNextSection()call should be removed if it's no longer needed.- // this.expandNextSection();app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card.hbs (1)
Line range hint
15-24: Consider extracting common button patternThe "Next question" button pattern appears multiple times in the template. Consider extracting it into a reusable component.
app/utils/course-page-step-list/step.ts (1)
Line range hint
4-11: Enhance type documentationConsider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and usage of each step type, especially the newly added
PreChallengeAssessmentStep.export type StepType = + /** Introduction step shown to new users */ | 'IntroductionStep' + /** Assessment step to evaluate user's initial knowledge */ | 'PreChallengeAssessmentStep' + /** Setup step for configuring the development environment */ | 'SetupStep' + /** Main course stage steps */ | 'CourseStageStep' + /** Completion step for base stages */ | 'BaseStagesCompletedStep' + /** Completion step for extension stages */ | 'ExtensionCompletedStep' + /** Final course completion step */ | 'CourseCompletedStep';app/components/course-page/step-list-item.hbs (1)
23-26: Implementation looks good but consider reducing duplicationThe PreChallengeAssessmentStep implementation follows the existing pattern correctly. However, there's repeated styling and icon usage across multiple step types.
Consider extracting common step styles and icons into a shared template to reduce duplication. For example:
app/components/course-page/header/tab-list.ts (1)
34-40: Consider documenting the temporary nature of these mappings in a more structured way.The comments indicate these mappings are temporary ("for now"), but there's no tracking mechanism or timeline for when they should be revisited.
Consider:
- Adding a TODO comment with a ticket/issue reference
- Or adding a more detailed explanation of why these are temporary and what the final implementation should look like
- SetupStep: this.introductionTabs, // Can be the same as IntroductionStep for now + // TODO(#ISSUE-NUMBER): Temporary mapping until we implement dedicated tabs for setup steps + SetupStep: this.introductionTabs,tests/acceptance/course-page/complete-first-stage-test.js (1)
47-48: Remove commented-out debugging code.The commented-out
pauseTest()call appears to be debugging code that was accidentally committed.- // await this.pauseTest();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
app/components/course-page/header/main-section.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/header/main-section.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/header/tab-list.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/language-button.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/request-language-button.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/request-language-button.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/request-language-dropdown.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/requested-languages-prompt.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-expected-activity-frequency-section.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-proficiency-level-section.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-section.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-section.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-reminders-preference-section.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/show-other-languages-button.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/welcome-card.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/welcome-section.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/introduction-step/welcome-section.ts(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/step-content.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/course-page/step-list-item.hbs(1 hunks)app/controllers/course/pre-challenge-assessment.ts(1 hunks)app/router.ts(1 hunks)app/templates/course/introduction.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/course/pre-challenge-assessment.hbs(1 hunks)app/utils/course-page-step-list.ts(2 hunks)app/utils/course-page-step-list/introduction-step.ts(2 hunks)app/utils/course-page-step-list/pre-challenge-assessment-step.ts(1 hunks)app/utils/course-page-step-list/step.ts(1 hunks)app/utils/pre-challenge-assessment-section-list.ts(0 hunks)tests/acceptance/course-page/complete-first-stage-test.js(1 hunks)tests/acceptance/course-page/start-course-test.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/utils/pre-challenge-assessment-section-list.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/request-language-dropdown.ts
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-proficiency-level-section.ts
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-reminders-preference-section.ts
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/show-other-languages-button.ts
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/request-language-button.ts
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-expected-activity-frequency-section.ts
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-section.ts
- app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
tests/acceptance/course-page/start-course-test.js
[error] 57-57: Do not commit pauseTest()
(ember/no-pause-test)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/welcome-card.ts (2)
16-16: LGTM! Component namespace change aligns with migration strategy.
The update to the Glint registry path correctly reflects the move to the legacy namespace, which is in line with the PR's objective of restructuring components.
16-16: Verify all template references are updated.
Since this component's path has changed, we should ensure all template files referencing this component have been updated to use the new legacy path.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I found one reference to the component in app/templates/course/introduction.hbs but it's commented out:
Let me search for any other potential references to this component with a different pattern.
Based on the search results, I found that in app/templates/course/introduction.hbs, the WelcomeCard component is commented out and replaced with a new WelcomeSection component:
Let me verify if there are any other references to this component in JavaScript/TypeScript files.
No template references need to be updated
The component CoursePage::IntroductionStep::Legacy::WelcomeCard has already been properly handled in the codebase:
- It's commented out in
app/templates/course/introduction.hbsand replaced with a newWelcomeSectioncomponent - No other active template references to this component exist in the codebase
- The only other reference is the component's own definition file at
app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/welcome-card.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the old component path
# and verify all references use the new legacy path
# Check for old path references that might need updating
rg -l "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::WelcomeCard[^:]" --type=handlebars
# Check current usage of the new legacy path
rg -l "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::Legacy::WelcomeCard" --type=handlebars
Length of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any template files (hbs) containing the old or new component path
# First, find template files
fd '\.hbs$' | while read -r file; do
echo "=== Checking $file ==="
# Check for old path references
rg "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::WelcomeCard[^:]" "$file" || true
# Check for new legacy path references
rg "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::Legacy::WelcomeCard" "$file" || true
done
Length of output: 98745
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to WelcomeCard in handlebars files without the namespace prefix
fd '\.hbs$' | while read -r file; do
echo "=== Checking $file ==="
# Look for WelcomeCard usage without the full namespace
rg -A 2 -B 2 "WelcomeCard" "$file" || true
done
Length of output: 98910
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to WelcomeCard in JS/TS files
rg -l "WelcomeCard" --type=js --type=ts
Length of output: 107
app/components/course-page/step-content.hbs (1)
1-1: LGTM! Verify layout impact across different viewport sizes.
The addition of the flex class is appropriate for flexbox layout control. Since this div contains both conditional content (CompletedStepNotice) and yielded content, using flexbox provides better layout control.
Let's verify if this layout change affects all possible content combinations:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Layout change is safe and appropriate
The addition of the flex class to the step-content component is verified to be safe because:
- The component has a simple structure with only two possible content blocks:
- A conditional CompletedStepNotice component
- The yielded content ({{yield}})
- The flex container properties (flex-grow, flex-shrink, min-w-0) were already present, making the
flexclass a natural complement - The component is used within expandable step lists where the flex layout helps maintain proper alignment and spacing of completion notices and step content
- Test files confirm the component is used consistently across different tutorial card types with similar layout patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all templates that yield content to step-content
rg -l "step-content" app/templates/
Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching in all directories and also check for component usage
rg -l "step-content" .
# Also search for any templates using {{yield}} within step-content component
ast-grep --pattern 'yield' app/components/course-page/step-content.hbs
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of step-content component and its usage in expandable-step-list
cat app/components/course-page/step-content.hbs
cat app/components/expandable-step-list/step.hbs
# Also check test files to understand usage patterns
cat tests/pages/components/course-page/course-stage-step/first-stage-tutorial-card.ts
cat tests/pages/components/course-page/course-stage-step/second-stage-tutorial-card.ts
Length of output: 4548
app/templates/course/pre-challenge-assessment.hbs (1)
8-9: Verify behavior with undefined language slug.
The @preferredLanguageSlug={{undefined}} might affect the user experience. Let's verify how this behaves in the UI.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the implementation of the language selection behavior.
Let me try a different approach to check the component implementations.
Based on the implementation files, I can now provide the final response:
Using undefined for preferredLanguageSlug is the correct behavior
The SelectLanguageSection component is designed to handle undefined language slugs gracefully. When preferredLanguageSlug is undefined:
- It shows all available languages by default through
availableLanguagesgetter - The
preferredLanguagesgetter will return an empty array, which is expected - The component includes UI logic to show/hide language options via
shouldShowNonPreferredLanguages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of preferredLanguageSlug to understand expected values
rg "preferredLanguageSlug" app/components/
Length of output: 599
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of create-repository-card component
ast-grep --pattern 'class CreateRepositoryCard {
$$$
}'
# Check how undefined language slug is handled
ast-grep --pattern 'class SelectLanguageSection {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation files
cat app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card.ts
cat app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-section.ts
# Find where this component is used
rg -l "create-repository-card" app/templates/
Length of output: 5388
app/components/course-page/introduction-step/welcome-section.hbs (2)
12-17: Verify behavior with undefined props.
Multiple undefined values are passed to the SelectLanguageSection component. Let's verify the component handles these gracefully.
✅ Verification successful
Props are safely handled with TypeScript interfaces and optional types
The component properly handles undefined props through TypeScript interfaces. The errorMessage and preferredLanguageSlug are explicitly marked as optional props with ? in the Signature interface, and the template safely handles errorMessage with an {{#if}} conditional. The preferredLanguageSlug is used in a getter that safely filters languages without any potential undefined issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SelectLanguageSection implementation to understand prop handling
ast-grep --pattern 'class SelectLanguageSection {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the component file first using fd
fd "select-language-section" --type f
# Then let's look for any handling of these props using ripgrep
rg "@preferredLanguageSlug|@errorMessage" -A 5
Length of output: 2577
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the TypeScript implementation to see how these props are handled
cat app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-section.ts
Length of output: 2328
9-9: Verify markdown sanitization.
Ensure the markdown-to-html helper properly sanitizes the markdown content to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the actual implementation of the markdown-to-html helper.
Let me try a different approach to find the implementation.
Markdown sanitization is properly implemented
The markdown-to-html helper uses DOMPurify to sanitize the HTML content after converting markdown to HTML using showdown. It also adds security attributes to links (target="_blank" and rel="noopener noreferrer"). The only exception is in FastBoot mode where DOMPurify is unavailable, which is logged as a warning.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for markdown-to-html helper implementation
rg -A 5 "markdown-to-html" app/helpers/
Length of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the MarkdownToHtml class/function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class MarkdownToHtml {
$$$
}'
# Also search for any markdown sanitization related code
rg -i "sanitize.*markdown|markdown.*sanitize" -A 5
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the markdown-to-html helper file content
cat app/helpers/markdown-to-html.ts
# Also search for any markdown processing related files
fd markdown
Length of output: 2110
app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/language-button.ts (1)
18-18: LGTM! Verify namespace consistency across codebase.
The namespace change aligns with the PR objective of moving components to legacy namespace.
Let's verify the consistency of the legacy namespace usage:
✅ Verification successful
Namespace change is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No references to the old namespace
CoursePage::IntroductionStep::CreateRepositoryCard::LanguageButtonexist - The new legacy namespace
CoursePage::IntroductionStep::Legacy::CreateRepositoryCard::LanguageButtonis consistently used in:- Type registry in
language-button.ts - Component invocations in
select-language-section.hbs
- Type registry in
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistent usage of the old namespace
# or mixed usage of legacy/non-legacy paths
# Search for any remaining non-legacy references
rg "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::CreateRepositoryCard::LanguageButton" --type hbs --type ts
# Search for the new legacy path to ensure consistent usage
rg "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::Legacy::CreateRepositoryCard::LanguageButton" --type hbs --type ts
Length of output: 966
app/templates/course/introduction.hbs (1)
12-17: Remove commented legacy code
Since we're moving components to the legacy namespace as per PR objectives, we should remove the commented code if it's no longer needed.
Let's verify if these legacy components are still referenced elsewhere:
app/components/course-page/header/main-section.hbs (1)
32-34: LGTM! Good separation of concerns
Moving the visibility logic to a computed property improves maintainability and readability of the template.
app/components/course-page/header/main-section.ts (1)
25-42: Verify impact on other step types
Let's ensure this visibility logic works correctly for all step types in the application.
✅ Verification successful
The previous pattern might have been too specific. Let's try different approaches to find step type implementations in the codebase.
The search results show several step-related files in the app/utils/course-page-step-list/ directory. Let's examine their implementations to understand the different step types and verify if the visibility logic is appropriate for all of them.
Progress indicator visibility is appropriate for all step types
The visibility logic in main-section.ts is correct and works well with all step types in the application. Here's why:
- The base
Stepclass instep.tsdefines all possible step types:IntroductionStep,PreChallengeAssessmentStep,SetupStep,CourseStageStep,BaseStagesCompletedStep,ExtensionCompletedStep, andCourseCompletedStep - The visibility logic specifically handles:
- Completed steps (all types) - showing completion banner instead
- In-progress steps (all types) - hiding to avoid distraction
- Introduction steps - hiding to focus on content
- All other step types appropriately show the progress indicator when they're not in these states
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all step type implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'get type(): $_ { return $_; }'
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for step type definitions using a more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'type = $_'
# Also search for any class that might define step types
rg -l "class.*Step"
# Search for string literals containing "Step" to catch potential step type definitions
rg '".*Step"' -l
Length of output: 4029
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the step types in the course-page-step-list directory
cat app/utils/course-page-step-list/step.ts
# Also check the implementation of specific step types
cat app/utils/course-page-step-list/introduction-step.ts
cat app/utils/course-page-step-list/course-stage-step.ts
cat app/utils/course-page-step-list/setup-step.ts
Length of output: 10750
app/utils/course-page-step-list/step.ts (1)
6-6: Verify integration of new step type
The addition of PreChallengeAssessmentStep requires verification of its integration in the step flow.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the routing and template integration.
Let me check the actual template content and look for any route definitions in the routes directory since router.js wasn't found.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
PreChallengeAssessmentStep is properly integrated
The new step type is well-integrated across the codebase with:
- Proper step type definition in
step.ts - Implementation class extending
Stepinpre-challenge-assessment-step.ts - Integration in the step list creation flow in
course-page-step-list.ts - UI handling in
step-list-item.hbswith appropriate icon rendering - Tab handling in
header/tab-list.ts - Dedicated template at
app/templates/course/pre-challenge-assessment.hbswith repository card integration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for PreChallengeAssessmentStep implementations and usage
rg -A 5 "PreChallengeAssessmentStep"
# Check for route definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'this.route("pre-challenge-assessment"'
Length of output: 3763
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for pre-challenge-assessment route and template
rg "pre-challenge-assessment" app/router.js app/routes/ -A 5
# Check for pre-challenge-assessment templates
fd "pre-challenge-assessment" app/templates/
# Check for any additional implementations or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface PreChallengeAssessment'
Length of output: 265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check template content
cat app/templates/course/pre-challenge-assessment.hbs
# Look for route definitions in routes directory
fd "route.ts" app/routes/course/
# Check for any controller definitions
rg -g "**/*controller.ts" "pre-challenge-assessment"
Length of output: 771
app/components/course-page/step-list-item.hbs (1)
23-26: Verify PreChallengeAssessmentStep type definition
Let's ensure the step type is properly defined in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that PreChallengeAssessmentStep is properly defined in the codebase. Let's verify its complete implementation to ensure it follows the expected pattern:
PreChallengeAssessmentStep type is properly defined and implemented
The type is correctly defined in the codebase:
- It's included in the
StepTypeunion type instep.ts - The class implementation in
pre-challenge-assessment-step.tsproperly extends the baseStepclass - All required properties and methods are implemented correctly
- The type is being used appropriately in the template
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PreChallengeAssessmentStep type definition
rg -t typescript "PreChallengeAssessmentStep" --type-add "typescript:*.{ts,tsx}"
# Search for step type enum/union type definition
rg -t typescript "type.*Step.*=" --type-add "typescript:*.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 1725
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete implementation of PreChallengeAssessmentStep
cat app/utils/course-page-step-list/pre-challenge-assessment-step.ts
# Verify the base Step class implementation
cat app/utils/course-page-step-list/step.ts
Length of output: 4002
app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card/select-language-section.hbs (1)
24-24: Namespace changes look good but verify completeness
The components have been correctly moved to the Legacy namespace, which aligns with the PR objective.
Let's verify that all references to these components have been updated consistently across the codebase:
Also applies to: 43-43, 51-51, 54-54, 62-62, 69-69
✅ Verification successful
All component references have been properly updated to Legacy namespace
The verification shows that all references to these components are consistently using the Legacy namespace. No instances of the old non-legacy namespace were found, and all components (LanguageButton, ShowOtherLanguagesButton, RequestLanguageButton, RequestedLanguagesPrompt) are properly referenced with the Legacy namespace in their respective files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining non-legacy references
rg "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::CreateRepositoryCard::(LanguageButton|ShowOtherLanguagesButton|RequestLanguageButton|RequestedLanguagesPrompt)"
# Search for new legacy references to ensure proper placement
rg "CoursePage::IntroductionStep::Legacy::CreateRepositoryCard::(LanguageButton|ShowOtherLanguagesButton|RequestLanguageButton|RequestedLanguagesPrompt)"
Length of output: 2491
app/router.ts (1)
49-49: Route addition looks good but verify related files
The pre-challenge-assessment route has been added in a logical location within the course routes hierarchy.
Let's verify the existence of required supporting files:
✅ Verification successful
Route and supporting files are properly implemented
The verification confirms that all necessary files are in place and properly structured:
- Controller exists with proper inheritance and service injections
- Template exists with appropriate components and layout
- Both files follow the expected patterns for an Ember route implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for controller and template files
echo "Checking for controller..."
fd "pre-challenge-assessment" app/controllers/
echo "Checking for template..."
fd "pre-challenge-assessment" app/templates/
# Check for any existing usages of the route
echo "Checking route usage..."
rg "pre-challenge-assessment" --type hbs
Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content of the controller and template to ensure they're properly implemented
echo "Controller content:"
cat app/controllers/course/pre-challenge-assessment.ts
echo -e "\nTemplate content:"
cat app/templates/course/pre-challenge-assessment.hbs
# Check for any route transitions to this new route
echo -e "\nChecking route transitions:"
rg "transitionTo.*pre-challenge-assessment" --type ts
Length of output: 1588
app/components/course-page/header/tab-list.ts (1)
40-40: Verify the impact of reusing introductionTabs for PreChallengeAssessmentStep.
While reusing introductionTabs simplifies the implementation, we should ensure this provides appropriate navigation options for the pre-challenge assessment context.
Let's check if there are any PreChallengeAssessmentStep-specific requirements that might need dedicated tabs:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the introduction tabs implementation and pre-challenge assessment usage to verify if the reuse is appropriate.
Let me check the CreateRepositoryCard component since it's being used in the pre-challenge assessment.
Let me check the introduction tabs implementation one more time to make the final assessment.
Reusing introductionTabs for PreChallengeAssessmentStep is appropriate
The pre-challenge assessment step uses the CreateRepositoryCard component to collect initial user preferences (language, proficiency, activity frequency, and reminders). The introductionTabs implementation, which provides a single "Instructions" tab with document icon, is suitable for this context as it allows users to focus on completing the assessment form without unnecessary navigation options.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PreChallengeAssessmentStep-specific requirements or TODOs
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,hbs}' -i "pre.?challenge.?assessment"
Length of output: 2894
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the introduction tabs implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'get introductionTabs() {
$$$
}'
# Check pre-challenge assessment template to see navigation needs
cat app/templates/course/pre-challenge-assessment.hbs
Length of output: 593
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check CreateRepositoryCard implementation
cat app/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card.ts
# Also check the pre-challenge assessment section list implementation
cat app/utils/pre-challenge-assessment-section-list.ts
Length of output: 6555
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check TabList implementation to see introductionTabs
cat app/components/course-page/header/tab-list.ts
Length of output: 4853
app/utils/course-page-step-list.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM: Clean import addition.
The import statement is correctly placed with other step-related imports.
35-35: Verify the step sequence logic with PreChallengeAssessmentStep.
The addition of PreChallengeAssessmentStep between IntroductionStep and SetupStep modifies the course progression. Let's ensure this sequence aligns with the intended user flow.
Let's check for any sequence-dependent code:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:
The step sequence is safely handled by the application's architecture.
The codebase implements a robust step navigation system where:
- Steps are managed through a
StepListclass that handles step sequencing vianextVisibleStepForandpreviousVisibleStepFormethods - Step transitions are handled through a dedicated state management service (
CoursePageState) - The UI components adapt dynamically to step changes and handle navigation appropriately
- The addition of
PreChallengeAssessmentStepis safely integrated into the linear progression as it's simply pushed into the steps array between Introduction and Setup steps
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for code that might depend on step sequence
ast-grep --pattern 'previousVisibleStepFor($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'nextVisibleStepFor($$$)'
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of PreChallengeAssessmentStep and related step classes
rg -A 5 "class PreChallengeAssessmentStep"
# Check where steps are used and their sequence logic
rg -A 5 "steps\.(push|unshift|splice)"
# Look for any step ordering or navigation logic
rg -A 5 "(next|previous).*Step"
Length of output: 29812
| get currentStep(): Step { | ||
| return this.coursePageState.currentStep as Step; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety checks for currentStep getter
The type casting with as Step could lead to runtime errors if coursePageState.currentStep is undefined or of a different type.
Consider adding type guards and error handling:
get currentStep(): Step {
- return this.coursePageState.currentStep as Step;
+ const step = this.coursePageState.currentStep;
+ if (!step) {
+ throw new Error('Current step is not defined');
+ }
+ if (!(step instanceof Step)) {
+ throw new Error('Current step is not a valid Step instance');
+ }
+ return step;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return 'in_progress'; | ||
| return this.repository.language ? 'complete' : 'not_started'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety for repository.language access
The status getter accesses repository.language without type checking, which could lead to runtime errors.
Add proper type guards:
get status() {
- return this.repository.language ? 'complete' : 'not_started';
+ if (!this.repository || typeof this.repository !== 'object') {
+ return 'not_started';
+ }
+ return 'language' in this.repository && this.repository.language ? 'complete' : 'not_started';
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return this.repository.language ? 'complete' : 'not_started'; | |
| if (!this.repository || typeof this.repository !== 'object') { | |
| return 'not_started'; | |
| } | |
| return 'language' in this.repository && this.repository.language ? 'complete' : 'not_started'; |
| get routeParams() { | ||
| return { | ||
| route: 'course.pre-challenge-assessment', | ||
| models: [this.repository.course.slug], | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null safety checks in routeParams getter
The repository.course.slug access chain could potentially throw if repository or course is null/undefined.
Consider adding null checks:
get routeParams() {
+ if (!this.repository?.course) {
+ throw new Error('Repository or course is not initialized');
+ }
+
return {
route: 'course.pre-challenge-assessment',
models: [this.repository.course.slug],
};
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| get routeParams() { | |
| return { | |
| route: 'course.pre-challenge-assessment', | |
| models: [this.repository.course.slug], | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| get routeParams() { | |
| if (!this.repository?.course) { | |
| throw new Error('Repository or course is not initialized'); | |
| } | |
| return { | |
| route: 'course.pre-challenge-assessment', | |
| models: [this.repository.course.slug], | |
| }; | |
| } |
| import Step from 'codecrafters-frontend/utils/course-page-step-list/step'; | ||
| import type ProgressIndicator from 'codecrafters-frontend/utils/course-page-step-list/progress-indicator'; | ||
| import { tracked } from '@glimmer/tracking'; | ||
| import type RepositoryModel from 'codecrafters-frontend/models/repository'; | ||
|
|
||
| export default class PreChallengeAssessmentStep extends Step { | ||
| @tracked repository: RepositoryModel; | ||
|
|
||
| constructor(repository: RepositoryModel) { | ||
| super(); | ||
|
|
||
| this.repository = repository; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| get progressIndicator(): ProgressIndicator | null { | ||
| if (this.status === 'complete') { | ||
| return { | ||
| dotType: 'none', | ||
| text: 'Pre-challenge assessment complete.', | ||
| }; | ||
| } else { | ||
| return { | ||
| dotType: 'none', | ||
| text: 'Complete pre-challenge assessment to proceed', | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| get routeParams() { | ||
| return { | ||
| route: 'course.pre-challenge-assessment', | ||
| models: [this.repository.course.slug], | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| get status() { | ||
| if (!this.repository.language) { | ||
| return 'locked'; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return this.repository.preChallengeAssessmentSectionList.isComplete ? 'complete' : 'in_progress'; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| get title() { | ||
| return 'Pre-challenge assessment'; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| get type(): 'PreChallengeAssessmentStep' { | ||
| return 'PreChallengeAssessmentStep'; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Tests needed for PreChallengeAssessmentStep implementation
Based on the codebase analysis, there's no test coverage for the PreChallengeAssessmentStep class. The class implements critical functionality including status management, route parameters, and progress indicators that should be tested. You should add unit tests that verify:
- Status transitions based on repository language and preChallengeAssessmentSectionList
- Progress indicator text for complete and incomplete states
- Route parameter generation
- Title and type getters
Example test location: tests/unit/utils/course-page-step-list/pre-challenge-assessment-step-test.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage for the new step type
This is a new class implementing core step functionality. We should ensure proper test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files related to pre-challenge-assessment
fd -e ts -e js "pre-challenge-assessment.*test" tests/
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for test files related to steps
fd -e ts -e js "step.*test" tests/
# Also search for any mentions of PreChallengeAssessmentStep in test files
rg "PreChallengeAssessmentStep" tests/ -l
# Let's also check the implementation directory for any test files
fd -e ts -e js "test" app/utils/course-page-step-list/
Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more general search for test files in the tests directory
fd -e ts -e js "test" tests/
# Let's also look for the base Step class tests as they might include test patterns
rg "class Step" tests/ -A 5
# Search for any test utilities or helpers that might be relevant
fd -e ts -e js "test-helper" .
Length of output: 7038
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any existing step-related tests in the unit tests directory
rg "Step" tests/unit/ -A 5
# Look for test patterns in course-page related tests as they might contain step tests
rg "Step" tests/integration/components/course-page/ -A 5
# Check the base Step class implementation to see test patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'class Step {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5861
| try { | ||
| await this.args.repository.save(); // TODO: This is kinda slow, investigate ways to make it faster | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.args.repository.language = undefined; | ||
| this.repositoryCreationErrorMessage = | ||
| 'Failed to create repository, please try again? Contact us at [email protected] if this error persists.'; | ||
| Sentry.captureException(error); | ||
|
|
||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and user feedback
The error handling could be improved in several ways:
- The error message could be more specific based on the error type
- The user should be informed that their language selection was reset
- Consider adding a retry mechanism
try {
await this.args.repository.save();
} catch (error) {
this.args.repository.language = undefined;
+ const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred';
this.repositoryCreationErrorMessage =
- 'Failed to create repository, please try again? Contact us at [email protected] if this error persists.';
+ `Failed to create repository: ${errorMessage}. Your language selection has been reset. Please try again or contact us at [email protected] if this error persists.`;
Sentry.captureException(error);
+
+ // Log additional context for debugging
+ Sentry.setContext("repository", {
+ id: this.args.repository.id,
+ selectedLanguage: language.id
+ });
return;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| this.args.repository.language = language; | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| await this.args.repository.save(); // TODO: This is kinda slow, investigate ways to make it faster |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Performance concern identified in multiple repository save operations
The same TODO comment about slow repository saves appears in two locations:
app/components/course-page/introduction-step/welcome-section.tsapp/components/course-page/introduction-step/legacy/create-repository-card.ts
The codebase shows extensive use of repository saves across different components, suggesting this is a systemic performance concern that deserves attention. Since this appears in both current and legacy code paths, it likely affects user experience during course initialization.
🔗 Analysis chain
Address TODO comment about slow repository save
The TODO comment indicates a performance issue that should be investigated.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this performance investigation?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar repository save operations and their implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'repository.save()'
Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern to find repository save operations
ast-grep --pattern 'await $_.save()'
# Also search for any mentions of repository save performance
rg -i "repository.*save.*slow|slow.*repository.*save" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 9080
| @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ module('Acceptance | course-page | start-course', function (hooks) { | |||
| await catalogPage.visit(); | |||
| await catalogPage.clickOnCourse('Build your own Dummy'); | |||
| await courseOverviewPage.clickOnStartCourse(); | |||
| await this.pauseTest(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debugging code before merging
The pauseTest() call will cause the test to hang indefinitely and should not be committed to production code. This appears to be debugging code that was accidentally left in.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- await this.pauseTest();🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 57-57: Do not commit pauseTest()
(ember/no-pause-test)
Test Results1 files ± 0 1 errors 0 suites - 1 0s ⏱️ - 6m 6s For more details on these parsing errors, see this check. Results for commit 1470b16. ± Comparison against base commit e8df03f. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests