Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(simsx): add back AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs #23236

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mmsqe
Copy link
Contributor

@mmsqe mmsqe commented Jan 7, 2025

with moduleStateCb to access moduleState and rawStateCb to extend rawState

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced application state generation with new callback mechanisms
    • Added extended configuration options for module and raw state processing
  • Documentation

    • Improved function comments explaining new state generation capabilities

The changes provide more flexible state initialization for testing and simulation scenarios, allowing developers to customize state generation with additional callback functions.

with moduleStateCb to access moduleState and rawStateCb to extend rawState
@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 13:49
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new function, AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs, which enhances the existing AppStateFn by adding two optional callback parameters: moduleStateCb and postRawStateCb. The AppStateFn is modified to call this new function, passing nil for the callbacks. The new function processes the application state and invokes the callbacks if they are provided. Additionally, comments have been added to clarify the function's behavior and its parameters, including panic conditions for certain input scenarios.

Changes

File Change Summary
testutil/sims/state_helpers.go - Added AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs function with optional moduleStateCb and postRawStateCb callbacks
- Modified AppStateFn to call the new function with nil for the new parameters
- Added comments to clarify the new function's purpose and behavior

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:Simulations

Suggested reviewers

  • alpe
  • kocubinski
  • facundomedica
  • tac0turtle
  • julienrbrt

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (1)

49-61: Enhance documentation with usage examples

While the documentation is clear, consider adding:

  1. Example usage of the callbacks
  2. Clarification of when exactly the panic occurs (currently only mentioned in docs)

Example documentation addition:

// Example:
//
//	AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs(
//		cdc,
//		addressCodec,
//		validatorCodec,
//		modules,
//		genesisState,
//		func(name string, state interface{}) {
//			if name == "bank" {
//				bankState := state.(*banktypes.GenesisState)
//				// Modify bank state
//			}
//		},
//		func(rawState map[string]json.RawMessage) {
//			// Add custom module state
//			rawState["custom"] = customState
//		},
//	)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1192da and a794072.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: tests (00)
  • GitHub Check: test-simapp-v2
  • GitHub Check: test-system-v2
  • GitHub Check: Analyze
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (3)
testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (3)

45-47: Clean implementation of backward compatibility

The modification elegantly maintains backward compatibility by delegating to the new extended function with nil callbacks.


163-165: Consider adding error handling for moduleStateCb

The callback could panic if the provided state doesn't match the expected type. Consider wrapping the callback in a recover block or documenting that users should handle type assertions safely.


169-173: Verify thread safety of rawStateCb

The rawState map is being modified after all module states are processed. Ensure that:

  1. The callback doesn't override existing module states
  2. Any concurrent access to rawState is properly synchronized

Run this script to check for potential concurrent modifications:

✅ Verification successful

Thread safety verification completed - No issues found

The code is thread-safe as the callback is executed synchronously within a single thread context, with no concurrent access to the rawState map. The callback's position after module state processing is a valid pattern for state customization.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any concurrent usage of rawState map
rg -A 5 "go\s+func.*rawState.*map\[string\]json\.RawMessage"

# Search for any goroutine spawning in simulation code
rg "go\s+func" --type go

Length of output: 4795


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the simulation_helpers.go file content
cat testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go

Length of output: 4968

addressCodec, validatorCodec address.Codec,
modules []module.AppModuleSimulation,
genesisState map[string]json.RawMessage,
moduleStateCb func(moduleName string, genesisState interface{}),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't both moduleStateCb and rawStateCb all for the same functionality? What is the purpose of including both of them?

The semantics of this function become confused because it is unclear to callers that first the module state callback is executed and then second the raw state callback is executed, meaning things could be overwritten

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is use case of accessing specific module genesisState first, then mutate the raw state accordingly. May be we can do a better naming of the post callback to prevent confusion.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (1)

49-61: Improve documentation clarity regarding callback execution order.

The documentation should explicitly state the execution order of callbacks to prevent confusion:

  1. moduleStateCb is called first for each module state
  2. postRawStateCb is called after all module states are processed

Also, consider renaming postRawStateCb to finalizeRawStateCb to better reflect its purpose as the final callback in the sequence.

 // AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs returns the initial application state using a genesis or the simulation parameters.
 // It panics if the user provides files for both of them.
 // If a file is not given for the genesis or the sim params, it creates a randomized one.
 // genesisState is the default genesis state of the whole app.
-// moduleStateCb is the callback function to access moduleState.
-// postRawStateCb is the callback function to extend rawState.
+// moduleStateCb is called first for each module's state during processing.
+// postRawStateCb is called after all module states are processed, allowing final modifications to the raw state.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a794072 and e280e0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: tests (00)
  • GitHub Check: test-simapp-v2
  • GitHub Check: test-system-v2
  • GitHub Check: test-integration
  • GitHub Check: build (amd64)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
testutil/sims/state_helpers.go (2)

45-47: LGTM! Clean delegation to the extended function.

The modification maintains backward compatibility by delegating to AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs with nil callbacks.


163-165: LGTM! Verify callback usage patterns.

The callback implementation is correct with proper nil checks and logical execution order. However, it would be beneficial to verify how these callbacks are used across the codebase to ensure they're used as intended.

Let's check the callback usage patterns:

Also applies to: 169-172

✅ Verification successful

Callback implementation verified as correct

The callbacks are properly implemented as optional extension points. Current codebase shows no active usage of these callbacks, which is fine as they are designed for future extensibility. The nil checks are necessary and correctly implemented.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find usage patterns of AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs to understand how callbacks are utilized

# Search for direct function calls
echo "Direct function calls:"
rg -A 5 "AppStateFnWithExtendedCbs\(" --type go

# Search for potential callback implementations
echo -e "\nPotential callback implementations:"
rg -A 5 "func.*\(.*moduleName string,.*genesisState interface{}\)" --type go
rg -A 5 "func.*\(.*rawState map\[string\]json\.RawMessage\)" --type go

Length of output: 1874


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar callback patterns and indirect usage
echo "Similar callback patterns:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "func\(.*string.*interface{}\)" --type go

echo -e "\nPotential variable assignments:"
rg "var\s+\w+\s+func\(.*string.*interface{}\)" --type go
rg ":\s*=\s*func\(.*string.*interface{}\)" --type go

Length of output: 766


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search with properly escaped patterns
echo "Searching for callback patterns in test files:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "func.*moduleName.*interface" --type go

echo -e "\nSearching test files for callback usage:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "moduleStateCb|postRawStateCb" --type go test

echo -e "\nSearching for variable assignments:"
rg "var\s+\w+\s*=\s*func.*moduleName" --type go
rg "\w+\s*:=\s*func.*moduleName" --type go

Length of output: 7454

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants