Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: bot versioning #274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

fix: bot versioning #274

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

ponderingdemocritus
Copy link
Contributor

@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus commented Sep 25, 2024

  • bumps bot

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a versioning property to the torii-bot project, indicating the current software version.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The change involves the addition of a new property, "version": "0.0.0", to the package.json file of the torii-bot project. This update specifies the package version, aligning with standard practices in Node.js projects. No other modifications were made to the file's existing properties or dependencies.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
examples/example-nodejs-bot/package.json Added property: "version": "0.0.0"

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagrams generated as the changes are too simple.)

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A version number hops today.
With "0.0.0" now in sight,
Our bot is ready, oh what a delight!
Let’s code and dance, and cheer with glee,
For every change brings joy, you see! 🐇✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8a3792 and 2e74225.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/example-nodejs-bot/package.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
examples/example-nodejs-bot/package.json (2)

4-4: LGTM: Version field added

Adding a version field to the package.json file is a good practice for Node.js projects. It helps in tracking the project's version and is often required by package managers.


4-4: Verify the intended version number

The PR objective mentions "bumps bot", but the added version is "0.0.0". This version is typically used as an initial version before the first release. Could you please confirm if this is the intended version, or if it should be bumped to a higher version?


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus merged commit da831a8 into main Sep 25, 2024
4 checks passed
@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus deleted the chore/burner-tests branch September 25, 2024 01:54
This was referenced Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant