Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use of Heurist model env vars #924

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

boxhock
Copy link
Contributor

@boxhock boxhock commented Dec 8, 2024

Relates to:

Risks

Low: If the user had previously set these env vars to any value, these will now be used where previously they would be ignored.

Background

What does this PR do?

This PR will make the previously defined Heurist model env vars actually take effect.

What kind of change is this?

Bug fix

Why are we doing this? Any context or related work?

Because the env vars are already defined, and it makes sense to use them.

Documentation changes needed?

My changes do not require a change to the project documentation.

Testing

Where should a reviewer start?

The change should be pretty straight forward.

Detailed testing steps

Copy link
Collaborator

@monilpat monilpat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! :)

shakkernerd
shakkernerd previously approved these changes Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Member

@shakkernerd shakkernerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice addition.

@shakkernerd shakkernerd changed the title Fix use of Heurist model env vars fix: use of Heurist model env vars Dec 9, 2024
@shakkernerd shakkernerd merged commit 621f3f4 into elizaOS:main Dec 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@boxhock boxhock deleted the fix-heurist-model-selection branch December 9, 2024 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants