Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rna-transcription exercise #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2024
Merged

Add rna-transcription exercise #21

merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2024

Conversation

ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@BNAndras BNAndras added x:module/practice-exercise Work on Practice Exercises x:rep/large Large amount of reputation labels May 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@BNAndras BNAndras left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'll ask on the Arturo Discord to confirm best practices here, but I suspect this should be toRna. That makes me think about using the to word to convert a DNA value to a RNA value like result: to :rna "A". For that, students will need to define a new RNA type. We can do that in an instructions append or add a custom DNA type at the top of the test suite so students hopefully get the hint about what's expected.

@BNAndras BNAndras mentioned this pull request May 26, 2024
64 tasks
@ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member Author

@BNAndras We also need to consider the difficulty of the exercise. This is traditionally a relatively straightforward exercise, so the custom type with to: could maybe be postponed to a later exercise too. Something to consider.

@BNAndras BNAndras merged commit 37dfb6e into main May 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@BNAndras BNAndras deleted the rna-transcription branch May 26, 2024 06:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
x:module/practice-exercise Work on Practice Exercises x:rep/large Large amount of reputation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants