Update jQuery to a more recent version in the docs

[Pezmc]

I note it's at 1.6.4 while jQuery is now at 1.12.1. It's suggested that people use a recent build of both chosen and jQuery, the docs should probably be doing the same!

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.4/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

[tjschuck]

@Pezmc Where do we suggest a recent build of jQuery? We support as far back as jQuery 1.4.

[koenpunt]

@Pezmc probably means that jQuery suggests using their latest version. But what is the win of using it in this case?

[tjschuck]

@koenpunt He might also be referring to this comment from me about upgrading specifically from versions 1.12.0 or 2.2.0 to 1.12.1/2.2.1, but that's to fix a bug in those particular versions, not recommending a general jump beyond other old versions.

Regardless, I suppose we are on a slightly arbitrary version. We are neither on the latest version nor the oldest supported version, so I guess there's no real reason to stay where we are ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[Pezmc]

Regardless, I suppose we are on a slightly arbitrary version. We are neither on the latest version nor the oldest supported version, so I guess there's no real reason to stay where we are ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Yes that's the point I was trying to make, it seems like the number on the docs page has been chosen at random! A newer copy, or at least a copy chosen with some documented decision would make sense here.

[koenpunt]

it seems like the number on the docs page has been chosen at random!

Pun intended here? 😄 But it was probably the latest version available at that time

[koenpunt]

While addressing the docs, we might consider looking into this again: #1829

[tjschuck]

@Pezmc Like @koenpunt, I assume it was the latest version available the last time it was updated 😉

I'd be okay with a version bump PR.

[koenpunt]

@Pezmc do you still want to address this?