Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1925] Implement DefaultMQAdminExt#setMessageRequestMode #1926

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 23, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1925

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the message request mode functionality with asynchronous processing.
    • Updated method signature for improved integration and error handling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the set_message_request_mode method in the DefaultMQAdminExt implementation. The method, previously containing a todo!() placeholder, is now replaced with an asynchronous implementation that delegates the actual logic to the default_mqadmin_ext_impl instance. The method signature is updated to return a crate::Result<()>, indicating a more robust error handling approach. This change integrates the method more deeply into the system's message request mode configuration functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs Updated set_message_request_mode method from placeholder to async implementation, added return type crate::Result<()>

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement DefaultMQAdminExt#setMessageRequestMode [#1925]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • RocketmqRustBot

Poem

🚀 In the realm of message flow,
A method once dormant, now starts to grow
Async magic, with parameters tight
RocketMQ's power shines ever so bright!
Code leaps forward, no more todo!() in sight 🐰


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b43bea and e2b0c72.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs (1)

529-538: Ensure robust testing for this new method.

While the delegate call to the underlying implementation is straightforward, it's crucial to confirm comprehensive unit or integration tests that validate various scenarios (e.g., different modes, timeouts, etc.). Doing so will strengthen confidence in the correctness of the message request mode configuration.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Dec 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.49%. Comparing base (3b43bea) to head (e2b0c72).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1926      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.50%   28.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         483      483              
  Lines       67818    67828      +10     
==========================================
  Hits        19329    19329              
- Misses      48489    48499      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 758951b into main Dec 23, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 23, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-1925 branch December 23, 2024 08:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Implement DefaultMQAdminExt#setMessageRequestMode
4 participants