-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an efficient reservoir sampling aggregator #1214
Open
marcusb
wants to merge
1
commit into
twitter:develop
Choose a base branch
from
marcusb:sampling
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
JMH benchmark results (Intel Core i9-10885H):
|
marcusb
force-pushed
the
sampling
branch
4 times, most recently
from
December 24, 2024 19:51
3d8bd4b
to
a0b526b
Compare
marcusb
force-pushed
the
sampling
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 24, 2024 20:44
036d5c2
to
431d5b7
Compare
This aggregator uses Li's "Algorithm L", a simple yet efficient sampling method, with modifications to support a monoidal setting. A JMH benchmark was added for both this and the old priority-queue algoritm. In a single-threaded benchmark on an Intel Core i9-10885H, this algorithm can outperform the old one by an order of magnitude or more, depending on the parameters. Because of this, the new algorithm was made the default for Aggregtor.reservoirSample(). Unit tests were added for both algorithms. These are probabilistic and are expected to fail on some 0.1% of times, per test case (p-value is set to 0.001). Optimized overloads of aggregation methods append/appendAll were added that operate on IndexedSeqs. These have efficient random access and allow us to skip over items without examining each one, so sublinear runtime can be achieved.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This aggregator uses Li's "Algorithm L", a simple yet efficient
sampling method, with modifications to support a monoidal setting.
A JMH benchmark was added for both this and the old priority-queue
algoritm. In a single-threaded benchmark on an Intel Core i9-10885H,
this algorithm can outperform the old one by an order of magnitude or
more, depending on the parameters.
Because of this, the new algorithm was made the default for
Aggregtor.reservoirSample().
Unit tests were added for both algorithms. These are probabilistic and
are expected to fail on some 0.1% of times, per test case (p-value is
set to 0.001).